Comments on: erotic?

By: Violent_Kitten

Violent_Kitten — Sun, 06 Jul 2008 22:49:45 +0000

Wow, bit of a bummer really to be woken up after 100 years to get carted off into slavery!

Yes true, it does depend on the partner, the time of month and time of life I guess!

Ya, part of me is open-minded and part of me is..not!

By: Grace Notes @ Snarkattack

Grace Notes @ Snarkattack — Sun, 06 Jul 2008 14:41:47 +0000

@ViolentKitten - I’m pretty sure I posted a link to the Beauty series in a previous blog post. Here we go.

Apparently, ‘non-con’ as it’s called is popular among some people. Wow, makes me feel…prudish. I consider myself fairly open-minded but I just can’t dig it.

Yeah, I did mention Lost Girls earlier this year when I was reading it. It’s just amazing, but yes, definitely challenging.

@nashiitashii - ah yes, actually, you have a point there (I dare say this was actually pointed out to me by a…partner…the other day. Sorry, probably too much information)

As for the pubic hair thing? Bonked if I know. Also, I get the whole oiling up a person’s body (yum) but oiling up their pubes? Whatever, haha.

By: nashiitashii

nashiitashii — Sun, 06 Jul 2008 14:33:45 +0000

Arousal can be really quick and easy depending upon the chemistry between the partners. There are partners that I’ve had that could get the same arousal reaction from me as in the Sleeping Beauty novels, and I’ve had partners who’d have to work to get me interested at all. It’s very highly situationally dependent for most of us.

Also, what’s Anne Rice’s obsession with big, fluffy pubic hair?

By: Violent_Kitten

Violent_Kitten — Sun, 06 Jul 2008 13:29:48 +0000

I haven’t heard of the ‘Beauty’ series, but I think I would agree with all your points.

Lost Girls does sound confronting. Is that the one you were talking about earlier?